![]() ![]() Because God's word was perfect, nothing could be added, nor taken away. People could see God's purpose, he believed, only if they could relate past, present and future. It needed distinct events, predicted beforehand, without vagueness and which "could not have been foreseen with human sagacity."Įdward Elliott viewed history as "God's education of the world" - a constant struggle between sin and gospel-grace. He was strict as to what proof would be required. He believed that if he could show "the fulfilment of Apocalyptic prophecy in the history of Christendom since St John's time" then he had gone a long way towards showing how essential the supernatural was to an understanding of all scripture. Įlliott wrote to support the supernatural inspiration of scripture against rationalist attacks from within the Protestant faith. And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron" clear and defined metaphors were being used which the audience could pick up upon there was no fanciful or poetic superfluity to the words chosen. For example, when John said of the locusts of the fifth trumpet, "and they had hair as the hair of women and their teeth were as the teeth of lions. In particular, John's audience was attuned to images and emblems in a way modern interpreters find hard to grasp. Allusions shared between John and his audience ensured each word meant much more than its dictionary definition. He tried to understand what the words of Revelation would have meant to their original hearers and readers. This meant studying the text in its original social context and comparing it with neighbouring social contexts. Although Edward Elliott defended a traditionalist position, he was keen to apply new historical techniques to Revelation. It ran through five editions (1844, 1846, 1847, 18)." In 1868, he published a Postscript to comment on the events, or perceived lack of events, marking the prophetically significant years, 1865/7.Ĭharles Spurgeon wrote in 1876, the year after Elliott died, that Horae was "the standard work on the subject." It remained the standard until Robert Henry Charles published his commentary on the Book of Revelation in 1920 and is still widely admired. Horae Apocalypticae consists of 4 volumes. Begun in 1837, its 2,500 pages are buttressed by some 10,000 invaluable references to ancient and modern works. Without an equal in exhaustive research in its field, it was occasioned by the futurist attack on the Historical School of interpretation. "Horae Apocalypticae (Hours with the Apocalypse) is doubtless the most elaborate work ever produced on the Apocalypse. ![]() The book is, as its long-title sets out, "A commentary on the apocalypse, critical and historical including also an examination of the chief prophecies of Daniel illustrated by an apocalyptic chart, and engravings from medals and other extant monuments of antiquity with appendices, containing, besides other matter, a sketch of the history of apocalyptic interpretation, the chief apocalyptic counter-schemes and indices." Horae Apocalypticae is an eschatological study written by Edward Bishop Elliott.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |